The Study
The European Commission DG ENER (Directorate-General for Energy) has entered a contract with Viegand Maagøe, Fraunhofer IZM and Intertek on a back-to-back evaluation and impact assessment study for the review Commission Regulation (EU) No 2019/2021 of 1 October 2019 laying down ecodesign requirements for electronic displays, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 2019/2013 of 11 March 2019 with regard to energy labelling of electronic displays.
Politicy context
Highlights of the political context regarding product policy relevant for this study are:
Commission Regulation (EU) No 2019/2021 was adopted as an implementing measure under Directive 2009/125/EC. The legislative process for replacing this Directive with an Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), which was proposed by the Commission in March 2022, is well advanced. This can reasonably mean that by the time a replacement is ready for the Regulation, it will be adopted under the framework required by the ESPR.
The ESPR is likely to explicitly require consideration of a range of circular economy related aspects, in addition to what has been consider already. If appropriate, measures related to these would be assessed in the Impact Assessment and where judged desirable be included in the legal proposals. In addition, there are expected to be requirements related to the identification and tracking of substances of concern.
Regarding the energy labelling, it important to highlight that electronic displays placed on the European Market are also registered at the EPREL Database. In May 2022, the database was launched for public access and consultation and it is an important source of information.
Objectives
The aim of the specific contract is to assist the Commission in a so-called back-to-back evaluation and impact assessment in order to review both regulations:
More specifically, the study objectives are to assist the Commission with:
Methodology
Two main tasks have to be carried out in a back-to-back review process:
Usually, evaluation and impact assessment are conducted sequentially so that the results of the evaluation process can be fully used in the subsequent impact assessment process. According to this so-called ‘back-to-back’ manner, evaluations and impact assessments will be launched at the same time and carried out (in a so-called ‘back-to-back’ manner) as a single process.
Moreover, the Study Team will support stakeholder consultation activities by defining and implement a comprehensive consultation strategy, aiming to gather information from all the identified stakeholder categories and meet the evaluation and impact assessment requirements.
This support to the consultation activities will include:
Timeline
Main milestones relevant for the stakeholders are:
Viegand Maagøe, Fraunhofer IZM and Intertek
Study conducted for the European Commission